Those of you from My Archives might remember that several years ago I worked many hours to create a decent copy of one small picture from the magazine Sassy. I didn’t succeed very well, because the picture in the magazine was small and poorly printed. (Some of you might have it on your computers but I doubt that many copied it.) I think that the picture was of more interest to me than to My Archive members. I thought that I looked “cute” in it. Anyway, I cursed Sassy magazine editors for their failure to produce a good copy of this picture.
I now have a copy of the original Ron Vogel photo, and it is Ron that I should have cursed. He overexposed this picture, but it was “cute” and Sassy ran it along with several “sexy” photos. Ron took six similar photos, all overexposed. Furthermore, the peignoir I was wearing was very sheer (the same one that was on the cover of Figure Annual) and very short, and I was not wearing panties under it. In a couple of these overexposed photos, Ron failed to adequately cover my pubic area. In the one that was published, there were dark shadows that cast a doubt about what was being exposed and what was being hidden by the sheer peignoir. Anyway, after many more hours of work, I have produced a better copy of this photo for my personal photo album.
Now I am going to start working on one that definitely shows that Ron failed to adequately cover my pubic area when he took these photos. It takes so long to adequately clean up these overexposed photos that I will probably only reproduce two for my personal photo album. (When I say that he failed to cover up my pubic area, you must remember that this was 1962 and nothing could even be hinted at. My pubic area is not on full display in any of these photos, unlike magazine photos taken a decade later. But in a couple of this set, there is a hint that my pubic area was not adequately covered.)